Legal Opinion

State v. Purnell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 2006No. C-060037PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman, Judge.

{¶ 1} The defendant-appellant, Clinton Purnell, appeals from the trial court’s postsentence order increasing the amount of restitution to be paid to the victim from $7,500 to $38,232.74. In his two assignments of error, appellant contends that (1) the trial court did not have jurisdiction to increase the amount of restitution after the judgment of conviction had been journalized and (2) the trial court abused its discretion when it modified the amount of restitution without sufficient evidence of economic loss to the victim. Because R.C. 2929.18(A)(1) requires the trial court to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Hansen v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. City of Brook Park v. NecakOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. DanisonOhio Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. Gilbert (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. SekicOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. AndrewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. MinknerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. DunsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API