Legal Opinion
Pillsbury Company v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 14, 1982No. 81-4087PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROGERS, District Judge.
This matter, requiring the interpretation and application of 28 U.S.C. § 1337(a), as amended, comes before this court on the motion of defendant Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (Santa Fe) to dismiss. The plaintiff, Pillsbury, is seeking damages for delivery of consigned goods in contaminated condition under Section 20(11), Interstate Commerce Act, now codified as 49 U.S.C. § 11707. The contaminated cargo was fifteen shipments of flour products to Fort Wayne, Indiana from Atchison, Kansas in August and September 1978 and twenty-seven…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Leon Thompson v. Kerr-Mcgee Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Eastern States Petroleum Corporation v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Akins v. SaxbeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1974
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hunter v. United Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Earth Scientists v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1985
- Ford Motor Co. v. Transport Indemnity Co. (In Re Automobile Transport, Inc.)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- Kansas City Terminal Railway Company, Interstate Commerce Commission, Intervening v. Jordon Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Simmons v. United Parcel ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.