Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Hill

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 8, 1926No. 11555. [fn*]Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellants insist, with much earnestness, that we erred on original hearing of this cause in overruling their many assignments of error to the admission of testimony tending to show several bodily injuries sustained by the appellee in the accident other than those specifically alleged, and pointed out in our original opinion. Following are some of the leading eases relied on in support of that contention: Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Gerald, 60 Tex. Civ. App. 151, 128 S. W. 169; Southern P. Co. v. Martin, 98 Tex. 322, 83 S. W. 675; Northern Texas T. Co. v. Jenkins (Tex.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. T. & P. R'y Co. v. CurryTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Stowe v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Receiver v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1894

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API