Legal Opinion

United States v. Al Bahlul

United States Court of Military Commission Review

Decided January 24, 2011No. CMCR Case 09-001Published

1Opinion of the Court

APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY AND EN BANC CONSIDERATION

DANIEL E. O’TOOLE, Chief Judge.

On September 16, 2010, the Court received Appellant’s motion to disqualify Judge O’Toole and Judge Thompson from sitting as appellate judges in the case of United States v. al Bahlul. Judge O’Toole 2 and Judge Thompson subsequently recused from further participation in this case.

ORDERED, the motion is DENIED as moot.

Upon sua sponte motion to reconsider the case of United States v. al Bahlul en banc, and upon the motion having passed by unanimous vote of all judges eligible to participate, it is

ORDERED,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
  4. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  5. United States v. McIlwainCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API