Legal Opinion

Kamin v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 24, 2002PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*574While plaintiff clearly suffers from chronic and painful conditions for which she had surgery and other treatment after the subject elevator accident, ample evidence shows that such conditions are due to a preexisting congenital and degenerative disease in plaintiffs spine. A fair interpretation of the conflicting evidence on causation supports the jury’s apparent finding that while the accident caused plaintiff some pain and suffering, it did not permanently aggravate her preexisting conditions or result in any serious new injuries (cf Grassi v Ulrich, 87 NY2d 954). Concur — Williams, P.J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grassi v. UlrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brandwein v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API