Legal Opinion

Marquette v. Marquette's Executors

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 14, 1921PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Pendleton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirming.

J. J. Marquette died testate and a resident of Pendleton county. His will, which was probated, after his death, named the appellees and defendants below, J. W. and L. B. Marquette, as executors thereof and at the time designated in the will (which was after the widow’s *183death) they qualified as such. After devising all of his property, both real and personal, to his wife for life and making a specific devise to his son, Columbus, the will contains this residuary clause:

“To the rest of my children, the remainder of my property, less three hundred…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kemper v. FortSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  2. Brisbin v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Harrell v. . HaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. Prather v. Watson'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Eichhorn v. MoratCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jennings v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  2. Carey v. JaynesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2008
  3. Hager v. BeckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949
  4. Martin v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Tarr v. Tarr'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API