Legal Opinion

Carey v. Jaynes

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 11, 2008No. 2007-CA-000148-MRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMBS, Chief Judge.

Leilani Christy Hale Carey brought an action to establish her right to a one-third interest in the rest, residue, and remainder of the estate of her father, Russell Fletcher Hale. The Madison Circuit Court concluded that Hale did not intend that Carey be a beneficiary under the terms of his will and dismissed the action. We affirm.

On October 3, 2000, Russell Fletcher Hale executed his last will and testament. In an introductory clause, Hale identified Russell Craig Hale and Whitney Suzanna Hale as his two living children. After providing for the payment of taxes and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Presley v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  2. Marquette v. Marquette's ExecutorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  3. Donelson's Ex'r v. CoatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  4. Youse v. FormanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
  5. Bell v. Louisville Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hood v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. In Re Estate of WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. Patterson v. RosaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Hood v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Hood v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API