Legal Opinion

John Deere Co. v. Haralson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 2004No. S03G1726PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hines, Justice.

This Court granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Haralson v. John Deere Co., 262 Ga. App. 385 (585 SE2d 711) (2003), to determine whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that a promisor on a guaranty cannot be sufficiently identified by his signature alone so that the guaranty is unenforceable under the statute of frauds. See OCGA § 13-5-30 (2). Finding that the Court of Appeals was incorrect, we reverse.

Tommy H. Haralson, Sr. (“Haralson”) is the former owner of Farmers Supply Store, Inc. d/b/a Big Boys Equipment (“Farmers Supply”) which sold equipment supplied by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North & Co. v. Mendel & BrotherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  2. Schroeder v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Sawyer v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Roach v. C. L. Wigington Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Tampa Investment Group, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Dabbs v. KEY EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. L. Henry Enterprises, Ltd. v. Verifone, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Elderberry of Weber City, LLC v. Living Centers-Southeast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API