Legal Opinion

L. Henry Enterprises, Ltd. v. Verifone, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 9, 2005No. A05A0396PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal, we must decide whether a note and guaranty agreement are unenforceable because the corporate maker’s name on the note and the guaranty differ slightly and both are different from the name registered for the corporation. Verifone, Inc. brought suit against Larry Henry (“Henry”) and L. Henry Enterprises, Ltd. a/k/a Larry Henry Enterprises, Inc., on a note and guaranty agreement. Cross-motions for summary judgment were filed, and the trial court granted Verifone’s motion and denied that of Henry and L. Henry Enterprises. We disagree with appellants’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Sysco Food Services, Inc. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. John Deere Co. v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Anderson v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Murray v. Pratt-Dudley Builders Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Crawford v. DammannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Dabbs v. KEY EQUIPMENT FINANCE, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. C.L.D.F., Inc. v. Aramore, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Elderberry of Weber City, LLC v. Living Centers-Southeast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API