Williams v. State

Shulman, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of burglary. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. Appellant enumerates as error the admission of testimony identifying a particular pair of shoes as belonging to the defendant. Since the court sustained appellant’s objection to the admission of such testimony, apparently on the ground that a proper foundation had not been laid, this enumeration of error is without merit.

2. Contrary to appellant’s contentions, the court properly admitted photographic evidence of the shoes seized from appellant’s home and footprints taken from a path leading from the…