Legal Opinion

Haden v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1933No. 8830PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. It is provided by statute that jury commissioners in the several counties, created under the provisions of the Penal Code, §§ 813 et seq., “on the first Monday in August, or within thirty days thereafter, . . shall revise the jury-lists, as provided in this article.” § 816. Also, that “on failure of the commissioners of any county to revise the jury-list as provided in this article, the judge of the superior court of such county, either in term time or at chambers, shall order the revision made at such time as he may direct.” § 818. In the instant case the jury commissioners began the work…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Manchester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Mooney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Clifton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Burney v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Hyde v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  5. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API