Legal Opinion

Kent v. Allied Oil & Supply, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1978No. 11948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Justice.

This is a suit by an employee (respondent) to recover from his employer (appellant) a percentage of net profits allegedly earned under a contract of employment. The parties first agreed that the respondent would receive $1,000 per month plus 40% of the net profit, and subsequently changed this agreement to $750 per month plus 50% of the net profit. The appellant urges that the contract of employment was void under the statute of frauds 1 as the same was incapable of performance within one year. We affirm the judgment.

As we view the contract, the salary was paid on a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Riata Cadillac CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Whaley v. VidalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Voegeli v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Tretheway v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Lien v. McGladrey & PullenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Lien v. McGladrey & PullenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API