Kent v. Allied Oil & Supply, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
This is a suit by an employee (respondent) to recover from his employer (appellant) a percentage of net profits allegedly earned under a contract of employment. The parties first agreed that the respondent would receive $1,000 per month plus 40% of the net profit, and subsequently changed this agreement to $750 per month plus 50% of the net profit. The appellant urges that the contract of employment was void under the statute of frauds 1 as the same was incapable of performance within one year. We affirm the judgment.
As we view the contract, the salary was paid on a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. Riata Cadillac CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- White Lighting Co. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Whaley v. VidalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Voegeli v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
- Tretheway v. Tri-State Milling Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Lien v. McGladrey & PullenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Lien v. McGladrey & PullenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.