Legal Opinion

Rahe, Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 9, 1960No. [No. 224, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants George and William Rahe, who are brothers, were convicted by the court, sitting without a jury, of breaking into a tavern with intent to commit a felony (larceny of goods and chattels of the value of $100 or more) and sentenced to terms of eight years and six years, respectively. They argue on appeal that there was insufficient evidence of felonious intent and that the sentences given them amounted to cruel and unusual punishment.

There was evidence that George said to William he wished he could get his wife some money for winter clothes, that George told his wife he was going to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  2. Felkner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Apple v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  4. Delnegro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  5. Merchant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Winder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Putnam v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  3. McNeil v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Cofflin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API