Legal Opinion
NATIONAL UN. FIRE INS. CO. v. Anderson-Prichard Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1944No. 2699PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
Effective January 1, 1941, the National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, issued and delivered its use and occupancy insurance policy to the Anderson-Prichard Oil Corporation, Anderson-Prichard Refining Corporation, and Anderson-Prichard Pipe Line Corporation “as their interest may appear”. By the terms of the policy, the insurer undertook to insure a complete oil refinery against actual loss of net profits, plus fixed and continuing overhead expenses, which the insured refinery is prevented from earning by reason of total or partial suspension…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Patapsco Insurance v. CoulterSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. Benedict Coal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Standard Marine Insurance v. Scottish Metropolitan Assurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Nusbaum v. Hartford Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Miller v. Hocking Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Jeffrey Wines and Brett Wines v. Lake Havasu Boat Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- GORDON CHEMICAL CO. INC. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Ebert v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- Hawkinson Tread Tire Service Co. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Associated Photographers, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, an Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.