Legal Opinion

Lookatch v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1935No. Appeal, 172PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This record is the picture of another futile attempt by the owners of two automobiles, traveling in opposite directions on the same public highway, to compel them, while in motion, to occupy the same spot thereon at one and the same time. As a result, plaintiff sues to recover damages for injuries to himself and his automobile, defendant counterclaims for damages to his automobile; the jury rendered a verdict for plaintiff; the court entered judgment thereon; and defendant appeals. The judgment must be affirmed.

Appellant’s contentions here are: (1) He was not negligent; (2)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. Equitable Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Mountain v. American Window Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Lewis v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holton v. GibsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Long v. Pennsylvania Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Cunningham v. SpanglerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Rankin v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Fasick v. ByerlySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API