Legal Opinion

Parra-Rojas v. Attorney General United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 26, 2014No. 13-1828PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RENDELL, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Carlos Parra-Rojas was convicted of Bringing In or Harboring Aliens for Financial Gain, in violation of section 274(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Petitioner subsequently applied for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a). The Immigration Judge denied Petitioner’s application under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i) (the “smuggling bar”), which renders an alien inadmissible if he has “knowingly ... encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Angelica LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Sejid Smriko v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Daniel Salvador Hernandez-Guadarrama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Juan Gonzalez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Victor Ramirez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Omar Argueta-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Dimova v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Omar Argueta-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Robson De Maria v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API