Parra-Rojas v. Attorney General United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RENDELL, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Carlos Parra-Rojas was convicted of Bringing In or Harboring Aliens for Financial Gain, in violation of section 274(a)(2)(B)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Petitioner subsequently applied for adjustment of status under 8 U.S.C. § 1255(a). The Immigration Judge denied Petitioner’s application under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(E)(i) (the “smuggling bar”), which renders an alien inadmissible if he has “knowingly ... encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Angelica LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Sejid Smriko v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Daniel Salvador Hernandez-Guadarrama v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Juan Gonzalez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Victor Ramirez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Omar Argueta-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Dimova v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Omar Argueta-RosalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Robson De Maria v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020