Legal Opinion
Aubrey Tinsley Sade v. Northern Natural Gas Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1972No. 71-1103PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
The real issue to be resolved here is the effect, if any, of the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Law on an action sounding in fraud brought by one Aubrey Tinsley Sade against Northern Natural Gas Company in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. The trial court concluded that the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Law precluded the maintenance of such action and granted Northern’s motion for summary judgment. Sade appeals. We reverse.
The present controversy arises out of the following chronology: (1) The Dresser Engineering Company, an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Tidewater Oil Company, a Corporation v. Dennis F. WallerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barfield v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Saharceski v. MarcureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Aubrey Tinsley Sade v. Northern Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Childs v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma State UniversitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Special Indemnity Fund v. BedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.