Gulf, M. & N. R. v. Illinois Cent. R.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, District Judge.
The motion of the plaintiff railroad company for a preliminary injunction seeks to restrain the defendant railroad company from an alleged violation of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Finance Docket No. 9916, 193 I.C.C, 106), and to.restrain the defendant from interference with the operation by plaintiff of its through freight trains, drawn by its own locomotives and in charge of its own crews between Bemis, Tenn., and Paducah, Ky., over the tracks of the defendant, pursuant to the provisions of a trackage contract between the parties of date June 7,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Glass Marine Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Gulf, Mobile & Northern Railroad v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940