People v. Remington
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOLMDAHL, J.
Summary of Case
Defendant stole a shotgun and other weapons, then used the shotgun to take a van at gunpoint, to murder a deputy sheriff, and to shoot at other people. He contends on appeal that his murder conviction must be reversed because of errors in jury instructions and that four of his convictions for aggravated assault, plus his conviction for theft of firearms, must be reversed because those crimes did not occur in the county in which he was tried.
The judgment is affirmed.
Facts
There is no factual dispute about the events which led to defendant’s arrest and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. TabucchiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. PoseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. SeringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. Gbadebo-SodaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.