Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1942No. Civil No. 4406PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

— This action was brought by the Valley National Bank of Phoenix, a national banking association, against the State Tax Commission seeking a declaratory judgment as to whether it should pay a sales tax on rentals it has collected and proposes to collect from tenants of offices in the Security Building located in Phoenix. It acquired said building on December 23, 1938, in the ordinary course of its banking operations and, as an incident of ownership and possession, leases space in the building and collects rent therefor. The federal statute, 12 U. S. C. A. § 29, permits a national bank to own…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Owensboro National Bank v. OwensboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. First Nat. Bank of Albuquerque v. AlbrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Federal Land Bank v. Bismarck Lumber Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Chase National Bank v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Compensation Fund v. SymingtonArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State Compensation Fund v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  3. First National Bank v. CommissionerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Arizona State Tax Commission v. First Bank Building Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. J. C. Penney Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API