Legal Opinion
Alvord v. Bicknell
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 27, 1932PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This suit is brought to restrain the defendants from diverting surface waters onto the premises of? the plaintiffs and to cause the removal of certain structures on a right of way to which the plaintiffs claim title by deed. The case was referred to a master who found that the plaintiffs suffered ho damage on account of the diversion of surface water. He also made certain findings hereinafter referred to respecting the obstruction of the plaintiffs’ right of way. With the consent of all the parties an interlocutory decree was entered confirming the master’s report.
The master found that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Willets v. LanghaarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Parsons v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Safford v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Kershishian v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ferrone v. RossiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Shea v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Fortier v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Lowry v. Commissioner of AgricultureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Stuck v. SchummMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.