Sanjour v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ motion to dismiss, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, and the oppositions and replies thereto.1 Because the Court considers evidence besides the pleadings, the Court treats the defendants’ motion as a motion for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and grants the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Background
Plaintiff William Sanjour filed his original complaint on October 28, 1991, seeking injunctive and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rankin v. McPhersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- William Sanjour v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- William Sanjour v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Sanjour v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- William Sanjour v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- William Sanjour v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.