Legal Opinion

William Sanjour v. Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 29, 1993No. 92-5123PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE.

Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

SENTELLE, Circuit Judge:

Appellants challenge the constitutionality of an ethics regulation allowing employees of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to accept reimbursement for travel expenses they incur in giving “official” speeches, but not “unofficial” speeches, as violative of their First Amendment rights. The District Court granted summary judgment against them on their facial challenge, but allowed the litigation to proceed as to their as-applied challenge under the First…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. William Sanjour v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  2. National Treasury Employees Union v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  3. General Electric Company v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Sanjour v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  5. Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API