Legal Opinion
Beaty Shopping Center, Inc. v. The Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 15, 1963No. 8766_1PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAVEN, District Judge.
After the roof of its place of business literally fell in, plaintiff Beaty Shopping Center, Inc. (hereinafter called “Beaty”) sought to recover from defendant Monarch Insurance Company of Ohio (hereinafter called “Monarch”) under an extended coverage insurance policy including “direct loss by windstorm”. The loss occurred on July 9, 1959, at Rock Hill, South Carolina.
From a jury verdict and judgment in favor of Beaty, Monarch appeals, contending that:(1) It was entitled to a directed verdict and subsequently to judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the grounds that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v. Ellerman Lines, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moran v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- United States v. 25.406 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Robert Peter RussellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. George SchnabelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Anchorage, Inc. v. Superior Burner Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Edith Gill and United Services Automobile Association v. Rollins Protective Services Company, a Delaware Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.