Elder v. King
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice
(after stating the ease as above).
In view of the evidence in the record and upon due determination of weight and sufficiency, this court does not feel justified in exercising its power to approve and adopt as a fact the answer of the jury to question No. 1. The evidence in that respect is slight and conflicting and there is room to hesitate or doubt as to the existence of such ultimate fact. In our mind the answer must be considered as being against the weight of the evidence and upon that ground alone it is here disapproved and not adopted but is set aside. The deed of conveyance of the 13½…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Groesbeeck v. CrowTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Clark v. HaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Loving v. MillikenTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Gibbs v. PennyTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Brewster v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Logan v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Elder v. Byrd-Frost, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Schuyler v. LacyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- King v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Tarkenton v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.