Brewster v. Davis
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Harris. Tried below before the Hon. James Masterson.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Chief Justice.
Ordinarily when parol evidence is admitted to show that a deed, absolute on its face, was intended by the parties as a mortgage, it is done with the view of its enforcement as a mortgage. On the ground that equity forbids the use of the deed as a conveyance where the parties only designed it to operate as a security, parol evidence is allowed to show that such was the intention of the parties. The appeal is for equitable relief, and is accompanied with the proffer to do what equity requires, by submitting to the enforcement of the instrument as a mortgage. In such cases…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Grooms v. RustTexas Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by15 opinions
- Coker v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Young v. BlainTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Harrison v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Nagle v. SimmankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Elder v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.