Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Davis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1882No. Case No. 1454PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Harris. Tried below before the Hon. James Masterson.

1Opinion of the Court

Gould, Chief Justice.

Ordinarily when parol evidence is admitted to show that a deed, absolute on its face, was intended by the parties as a mortgage, it is done with the view of its enforcement as a mortgage. On the ground that equity forbids the use of the deed as a conveyance where the parties only designed it to operate as a security, parol evidence is allowed to show that such was the intention of the parties. The appeal is for equitable relief, and is accompanied with the proffer to do what equity requires, by submitting to the enforcement of the instrument as a mortgage. In such cases…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grooms v. RustTexas Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Coker v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Young v. BlainTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Harrison v. HogueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Nagle v. SimmankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Elder v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API