Legal Opinion

Sheldon and Anita Drobny v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 29, 1996No. 95-5084Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

86 F.3d 1174

77 A.F.T.R.2d 96-1667, 96-1 USTC P 50,255

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Sheldon and Anita DROBNY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 95-5084.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 10, 1996.

Rehear…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Karen Dahn v. United States of America Maureen Ames and Keith FinleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. James Karr and Nancy L. Karr v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Seymour Sacks Star Sacks v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service, Michael R. Geyser Joyce Geyser v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API