Legal Opinion

Holland v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 8, 2001No. A01A0081PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Chief Judge.

Paul M. Holland appeals the trial court’s denial of his ineffectiveness of counsel claim arising out of his criminal conviction. A jury convicted Holland of homicide by vehicle in the second degree and improperly backing his vehicle into a roadway. In Holland v. State, 1 this Court found sufficient evidence to support those convictions but remanded the case solely for an evidentiary hearing on Holland’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Subsequently, the trial court rejected the ineffectiveness claim, and we affirm that determination.

A defendant asserting…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jefferson v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  3. Luallen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. Mency v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Carl v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. LaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  2. Schofield v. HolseySupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  3. Hunt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. McNabb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API