Legal Opinion

Krill v. Brownell

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1886Published

Appeal from an order of the Monroe Special Term confirming the report of a referee allowing a claim against the estate of a deceased person, and adjudging that the claimant is entitled to recover his disbursements.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, P. J.:

' The only question in this case is whether the prevailing party, upon the reference of a claim against the estate of a deceased per*73son, is entitled to recover the fees of referees and witnesses and his other necessary disbursements, as matter of right. There are conflicting decisions upon the question. The point of difference is whether that clause of section 317 of the Code of Procedure, as-amended by chapter 479 of the Laws of 1851, which gives the right, is still in force. The clause provides that whenever any claim against a deceased person shall be referred, pursuant to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daggett v. MeadNew York Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API