Legal Opinion

Daggett v. Mead

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Motion for confirmation of referee’s report and for costs and disbursements. The plaintiff presented a claim to the defendant as executor of the last will and testament of Nancy Mead, deceased, for §2,300.51, for board, care and necessaries furnished testatrix during the two years preceding her decease. The executor rejected the claim and refused to pay it as exorbitant. A stipulation was made, whereby it was referred under the statute.

Read the full summary

Motion for confirmation of referee’s report and for costs and disbursements. The plaintiff presented a claim to the defendant as executor of the last will and testament of Nancy Mead, deceased, for §2,300.51, for board, care and necessaries furnished testatrix during the two years preceding her decease. The executor rejected the claim and refused to pay it as exorbitant. A stipulation was made, whereby it was referred under the statute. The referee found in favor of the plaintiff to the amount of $1,273.98, reducing plaintiff’s claim §1,026.53. Plaintiff made a motion at special term for…

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, J.

[Without opinion.]—“Ordered, that the referee’s report be confirmed and that plaintiff have judgment according to the usual practice of the court for the amount named in the referee’s report, with interest from its date.

“No costs or disbursements are allowed.”

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Overheiser v. MorehouseNew York Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hall v. EdmundsNew York Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Dryer v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Healy v. MurphyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1891
  5. Krill v. BrownellNew York Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API