Legal Opinion

United States v. Wright

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 2, 2017No. Criminal No. 2016-0073PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Denying Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence and Statements

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Tyrone Wright is charged with three counts of bank robbery in violation of 18, U.S.C. § 2113(a). The government alleges that, over a two-day period, Mr. Wright robbed a Premier Bank, twice, and a TD Bank, once. Mr. Wright, pro se, moved to suppress some of the physical evidence and statements that the government collected. 1 See Mot. Suppress Evid. & Statements, ECF No. 7 (Mot. Suppress). The government opposed this motion. See Gov’t’s Opp’n…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. WillsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. WillsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API