Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 26, 2010No. A09-247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s order to submit a DNA sample for identification purposes pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 609.117, subd. 1(1). Appellant argues that the statute, as applied to one who has not been convicted of a felony, (1) violates the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 10, of the Minnesota Constitution and (2) denies him equal protection of the law as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. Miller Brewing Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. State v. BartyllaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. In re the Welfare of M.L.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. STUDOR, INC. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. In re the Welfare of M.L.M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API