Legal Opinion
Rosenfeld v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 31, 2000No. 98 CIV. 7757(ERK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
KORMAN, Chief Judge.
The issue presented by this case is whether the Constitution of the United States requires that interest earned on funds deposited by customers in the highway, bridge and tunnel toll collection system known as E-ZPass be paid to E-*158ZPass customers. The E-ZPass system was developed for use by several toll authorities in the northeast region of the United States in order to ease traffic backups at highway, bridge and tunnel toll plazas and to reduce air pollution resulting from the traffic congestion associated with those backups. Ascher Aff. ¶¶ 11-12. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gillman v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1988
- John Brown v. Steve BrienenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Laface v. E. Suffolk BocesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Clinton v. OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Novak v. Overture Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- Rosenfeld v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NY AND NJDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000