Legal Opinion
Clinton v. OPPENHEIMER & CO. INC.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 19, 2011No. 10 Civ. 3286(JSR)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
On March 14, 2011, the Honorable Michael H. Dolinger, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) in the above-captioned matter recommending that the Court grant the motion of defendant Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. (“Oppenheimer”) to compel arbitration of plaintiffs claims for employment discrimination, and deny the motion of plaintiff Marisha Clinton for default judgment. On March 31, 2011, Clinton filed objections to the Report. Accordingly, the Court reviewed the Report, Clinton’s objections thereto, and the underlying record…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nieblas-Love v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Bassett v. Electronic Arts, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Anna Surman, by and through the Administrators of her Estate, Gregory Surman and Karen Connolly; and Karen Connolly, in her individual capacity v. MongoDB, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Asiedu v. Broadreach Medical ResourcesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Brevard v. Credit SuisseDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.