Legal Opinion

Sikes v. Mallonee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 4, 1912No. 3627PublishedCited by 3 opinions

• Action on guaranty; from city court of Savannah — Judge Davis Freeman. July 7, 1911:

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. Lee leased in writing from Sikes certain timber lands upon certain terms and conditions. Mallonee guaranteed payment of the purcháse-money as set out in Lee’s contract. Subsequently the terms and conditions of the contract were materially modified. As Mallonee’s contract of guaranty had to be in writing (Civil Code, § 3222, par. 2), so likewise, under the general rule, any proposed modification thereof, to be effective, must also have been in writing. Southern Ry. Co. v. Smith, 106 Ga. 864 (33 S. E. 28); Miller v. Smith, 6 Ga. App. 448 (65 S. E. 292). And a contract of guaranty is no less…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Augusta Southern Railroad v. Smith & Kilby Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Executors of Riggins v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Miller v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. Enterprise Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  2. Missouri Finance Corp. v. RoosMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Stein v. RichmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API