Legal Opinion

Missouri Finance Corp. v. Roos

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

'This is an action upon a contract of guaranty. The suit was originally instituted against three defendants, two of whom remained in default throughout the ease. The third defendant, Morris Friedman, died during the pendency of the suit and the cause was revived against Mrs. Emma Friedman, administratrix of his estate. The trial of the cause to the court and jury resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the administratrix, and she in due course appeals.

The amended petition upon which the case was tried alleged in substance that on April 9, 1927, the plaintiff entered into a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ThueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. First National Bank v. FrickeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
  3. Evans v. ForemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  4. Executors of Riggins v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  5. Moore v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank of Smithville v. LairMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Beauchamp v. North American Savings Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Kirkland v. ToddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Boatmen's National Bank of St. Louis v. NangleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Peoples National Bank v. Purina Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API