Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Lego

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1976No. Appeal, No. 1304 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The critical issue in this appeal from the decision and order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is whether Annetta Jane Lego (Claimant) voluntarily quit her employment with cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.1

It is undisputed Claimant voluntarily quit, and it is alleged she did so because she was physically incapable of continuing in her job.2 Since she voluntarily terminated her employment, the burden rests upon her to show cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Holtz, 19 Pa.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elshinnawy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Taylor v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board v. HoltzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Bruce v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Pastorius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API