Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Lego
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
The critical issue in this appeal from the decision and order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is whether Annetta Jane Lego (Claimant) voluntarily quit her employment with cause of a necessitous and compelling nature.1
It is undisputed Claimant voluntarily quit, and it is alleged she did so because she was physically incapable of continuing in her job.2 Since she voluntarily terminated her employment, the burden rests upon her to show cause of a necessitous and compelling nature. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Holtz, 19 Pa.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Elshinnawy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Taylor v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Unemployment Compensation Board v. HoltzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Pastorius v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977