Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Board v. Holtz

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1263 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Wilkinson,

The facts in this appeal from the disallowance of benefits under Section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P. L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802 (b)(1) by the Bureau of Employment Security, the referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review are not in dispute. Indeed, all the significant facts are stated in what appears to be claimant-appellant’s own handwriting on the Summary of Interview form signed by him, as follows:

“I gave 2 weeks notice of resigning because I was dissatisfied with working…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stalc v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Mosley v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Kernisky v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wert v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. McGuire v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. LegoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Denby v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Sparks v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API