Legal Opinion

Barton v. Hulsey

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided September 25, 1902Published

Appeal from the United States Court for the Central District. William H. H. Clayton, Judge- Suit by Mary A. Hulsey against A. J. Barton. Decree for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. '

1Opinion of the CourtGill, C. J.

The statement of the case is found in appellant’s brief, on pages 1, 2 and 3, and is as follows:

“This suit was begun on March 14, 1901, by the appellee filing a complaint on the chancery side of the docket against the appellant in the United States Court for the Indian Territory, in the Central District, at Totean. The complaint will be found at pages 1, 2, and 3 of the printed record, and as will b.e seen, it in substance sets out the following matter: That plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession of a certain farm or improvement located about five miles north of Fanshawe, and *262k…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Hayes v. HammondIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Martin Browne Co. v. MorrisCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1897
  4. Bartholomae & Roesing Brewing & Malting Co. v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API