Legal Opinion

National Ass'n of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers, Inc. v. Ayerst Laboratories

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 22, 1988No. 442, Docket 87-7710PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Circuit Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Kram, Judge, entered pursuant to an order of United States Magistrate Buchwald, dismissing appellants’ complaint. The underlying dispute began in January, 1986, when appellee Ayerst Laboratories, Inc. (“Ayerst”), a division of American Home Products Corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of brand name pharmaceuticals, sent a letter (the “January 1986 Letter” or the “Letter”) to pharmacists throughout the United States discussing the merits of substituting…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. James Stephen Jones v. M.L. Greninger, M.L. Greninger Yolanda Cornelius Ralph FigueroaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. Cosmas v. HassettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Randall K. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Cosmas v. HassettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Volvo North America Corporation, International Merchandising Corporation, and Proserv, Inc. v. Men's International Professional Tennis Council, M. Marshall Happer, Iii, and Philippe Chatrier, Men's International Professional Tennis Council and M. Marshall Happer, Iii, Counterclaimants v. Volvo North America Corporation, International Merchandising Corporation, and Proserv, Inc., Counterclaim-Defendants v. Donald L. Dell, Raymond S. Benton, Dell, Benton & Falk, Mark H. McCormack International Merchandising Group, International Management Inc., Transworld International Inc., and A.B. Volvo, Additional Counterclaim-DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API