Peoria Corp. v. Lemay
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1ConcurrenceOp Ala, Justice
The court correctly concludes today that this appeal, lodged here on January 10,1994, is too late for review of the nisi prius judgment, whose written memorial was entered below September 21, 1993, and too early for corrective relief from the trial court’s still-unmemorialized December 10,1993 denial of appellant’s postjudgment petition to vacate (judgment).
Unlike the court, I would dismiss this appeal as abandoned by appellant’s failure to *1342comply with this court’s January 19, 199k order. There, we directed her to cure the fatal infirmity by securing a journal entry of the postjudgment ruling…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Funnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Blessing v. PurdumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951