Legal Opinion

Blessing v. Purdum

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1951No. 35072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

On the 20th day of September, 1950, a judgment in replevin was entered in favor of plaintiff against the defendants. Defendants appealed to this court from said judgment after the order overruling motion for new trial was entered, and on June 30, 1950, filed their brief. On October 5, 1951, a motion to dismiss was filed on the ground that the appeal is frivolous. This court called for response to the motion and no response has been filed and no excuse offered for such failure. As stated in Gartrell v. Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kan., 180 Okla. 523, 71 P. 2d 489:

“Where a motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gartrell v. Federal Land Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peoria Corp. v. LemaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Peoria Corp. v. LemaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API