Legal Opinion

State v. Lemalu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1991No. 14296PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MOON, J.

Defendant-appellant Aukusitino L. Lemalu (Lemalu) appeals his conviction for Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicating Liquor (DUI) in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291 — 4(a)(2) (1985). Lemalu was arrested in 1987 and charged, in two separate counts, with violating HRS § 291-4(a)(l) (driving under the influence) (count I) and § 291-4(a)(2) (driving with a blood alcohol level of 0.10 percent or more) (count II). Following a jury trial, Lemalu was acquitted of count I but convicted of count II. On appeal, Lemalu asserts that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. JendruschHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. GrindlesHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. HalemanuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. DowHawaii Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. PulseHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CummingsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. RuggieroHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. DominguesHawaii Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API