Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided March 23, 1979Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Senator Cate,

The Attorney General has received your request for an opinion wherein you ask, in effect, the following question:

Must a disabled veteran actually be receiving benefits payable at therate of ten percent (10%) or more in order to qualify for the additionalpreference provided by 74 O.S. 817 (1978) that such veteran's name shallbe placed at the top of the register in accordance with the numericalrating of the other service-connected veterans in receipt of benefitspayable at the rate of ten percent (10%) or more?

War Veterans are defined by 72 O.S. 67.13a (1978), as follows:

"The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McVicker v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMM'RS OF COUNTY OF CADDOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. HaroldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. In Re Estate of RedwineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Ridley Packing Company v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. State Ex Rel. v. Texas Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API