Legal Opinion
Zigler, Admrx. v. Erler Corp.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided September 19, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
— On a writ of error taken under the statute (Sec. 2905, R. G. S., 4615 C. G. L., 1927) the only questions which can be considered are those involved in the order from which the writ of error is taken. Carney vs. Stringfellow, 73 Fla. 700, 74 So. 866 and cases cited. Such order will not be reversed where no abuse of discretion appears. Herrin vs. Avon Mfg. Co., 87 Fla. 385, 100 So. 174, and cases cited. No such abuse appears in this case.
The defendant in error has filed six cross assignments of error. These question the right of the plaintiff in error to maintain the suit and the sufficiency…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Hale v. Crowell's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Florida · 1849
- Wilder v. Punta Gorda State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Herrin v. Avon Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1924
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hollywood, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Beckwith v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Katz v. Red Top Sedan Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- State Road Department v. ZetrouerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.