Legal Opinion

Toledo Edison Co. v. Cramer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1932No. 2673Published

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

It is complainecj. that the court erred in giving the following instruction before argument at the request of the plaintiff:

“1. You are instructed that it is the law of this state that the test of the right of the plaintiff to a judgment against the defendant under the workmen’s compensation law for the death of her husband Hollace Cramer if caused by injuries received by him in the course of his employment with the defendant, is not whether there was any fault or neglect on the part of the employer, or his employees, but whether the employment had some causal connection with the death of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Industrial Commission v. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API