Legal Opinion

Steinmann v. Hosier

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1912Published

Proceeding supplemental to execution by one Steinmann for the examination of Edward B: Hosier as a third .party. On motion to vacate order for the examination of the third party.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCALL, J.

The order to examine Edward B. Hosier as a third party must he vacated for the following reasons:

[1] (a) The only property of the judgment debtor which is claimed to be possessed by the third party is a dower interest in real estate claimed to have been fraudulently assigned. Under section 2441 of the Code, a third party can only be examined if he has personal property of the debtor or is indebted to him in a sum exceeding $10.

[2] (b) A receiver of all the interests of the debtor in this-property has Seen appointed, and if there is real estate in the hands of third persons belonging to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. GowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Sorrentino v. LangloisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API