Legal Opinion

Sorrentino v. Langlois

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Ernest Langlois, judgment debtor, from an order of the County Court of Kings county, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on the 12th day of December, 1910, denying the defendant’s motion to vacate an order for the examination of a third party.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J. :

It appeared in the affidavit on which the original motion was made for the examination of a third party, as to property of the judgment debtor,! that a receiver had been appointed, and it likewise failed to appear by such affidavit that' the third person to be examined had personal property of the defendant, the said judgment debtor, exceeding ten dollars in value, or that she was indebted to jhim in a sum exceeding ten dollars. The affidavit was made in the alternative, and did not -allege that either of said facts jexisted. .(Collins v. Beebe, 7 N. Y. Supp. 442; Tifft v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tifft v. TifftNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Collins v. BeebeNew York Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steinmann v. ConlonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. Denison v. Jackson Bros. Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. New York & Brooklyn Casket Co. v. George Edmund Forbell, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Steinmann v. HosierNew York Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API