Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. Harrington
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McCRODDEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting attorney’s fees to petitioner pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 6-19.1 (1986). The North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) presents for review four arguments representing ten assignments of error. As in the companion case, Whiteco v. Harrelson, 111 N.C. App. 815, 434 S.E.2d 229 (1993) (Harrelson), we address the jurisdictional question, but we do so only briefly since the analysis used in that case applies to this one as well. Also as in Harrelson, we reverse the trial court on the issue of substantial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hulshof v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Tay v. FlahertyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- National Advertising Co. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crowell Constructors, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. CobeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Able Outdoor, Inc. v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- East v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996