Legal Opinion

East v. Harrelson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 3, 1996No. COA94-1303Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

On 6 February 1996, this Court in an unpublished per curiam opinion, see Outdoor East v. Harrelson (COA94-1303), relied upon the majority opinion in Appalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. *686Harrington, 120 N.C. App. 72, 460 S.E.2d 887 (1995), to affirm the trial court’s conclusion in the case sub judice that

the authority delegated to the North Carolina Department of Transportation pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. 136-126, et. seq., does not include the authority to promulgate regulations governing nonconforming outdoor advertising located in areas other than zoned industrial or commercial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Appalachian Poster Advertising Co., Inc. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  4. Appalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Whiteco Industries, Inc. v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API